Introduction

(this section is informative)

Reconciliation, as referenced in this specification, refers to the case where there exists a need to understand if multiple providers are referring to the same resource, particularly when there is not already a common identifier that all providers populate. For example, an IT environment discovery tool reports that it finds a computer using an IP address of 192.168.0.1 ; and a monitoring tools reports that CPU usage on the machine with hostname example1.domain.com. A system administrator would previously have to rely on experience or have to lookup manually that both tools are referring to the same physical resource. In HTTP terms, we want to determine that a set of URIs refer to the same “non-information resource” entity. See the Reconciliation Scenarios page for several specific examples.

This specification builds on the [[!OSLCCore2]] to define the resources and operations supported by Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC) providers who have a need to reconcile resource instance information with other providers.

The goal of this effort is to define resources, methods and constraints such that disparate tools can recognize that their data describes the same entity or concept (non-information resource). Reconcilable resources describe individual entities, including their relationships to other resources inside and/or outside of the Reconciliation domain.

IPR Policy

This Committee Specification Public Review Draft is being developed under the RF on Limited Terms Mode of the OASIS IPR Policy, the mode chosen when the Technical Committee was established. For information on whether any patents have been disclosed that may be essential to implementing this specification, and any offers of patent licensing terms, please refer to the Intellectual Property Rights section of the TC’s web page (https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/oslc-domains/ipr.php).

Terminology

Reconciliation Service Provider - an OSLC Service Provider that exposes reconcilable and/or reconciled resources.

Reconcilable resource - a resource that conforms to this specification, especially the “additional requirements” section for each resource definition. It can be matched to another resource based on the values of a set of properties as defined in this specification.

Asset Consumer - A collection of reconcilable resources that the Reconciliation Service Provider has determined to be representations of the same entity.

NOT - When used in the Resource Definitions section of this specification, indicates that the absence of a property is required.

References

Base Requirements

Compliance

This specification is based on [[!OSLCCore2]]. OSLC Reconciliation domain consumers and service providers MUST be compliant with both the Core specification and this specification, and SHOULD follow all the guidelines and recommendations in both these specifications.

The following table summarizes the requirements from OSLC Core Specification as well as additional requirements specific to the Reconciliation domain.

Note that this specification further restricts some of the requirements from the OSLC Core Specification as noted in the Origin column of the compliance table. See further sections in this specification or the OSLC Core Specification to get further details on each of these requirements.

Any consumer or service provider behaviors are allowed unless explicitly prohibited by this or dependent specifications; conditional permissive requirements, especially those qualified with MAY, are implicitly covered by the preceding clause. While technically redundant in light of that broad permission, OSLC specifications do still make explicit MAY-qualified statements in cases where the editors believe doing so is likely to add clarity.

Requirements on OSLC Consumers

Requirement Level Origin(s) Meaning
Unknown properties and content MUST [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC clients MUST preserve unknown content

Requirements on OSLC Service Providers

Requirement Level Origin(s) Meaning
Unknown properties and content MAY [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MAY ignore unknown content
Unknown properties and content MUST [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MUST return an error code if recognized content is invalid.
Unknown properties and content SHOULD [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers SHOULD NOT return an error code for unrecognized content.
Resource Operations MUST [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MUST support resource operations via standard HTTP operations
Resource Paging MAY [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC services MAY provide paging for resources
Partial Resource Representations MAY [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MAY support HTTP GET requests for retrieval of a subset of a resource’s properties via the oslc.properties URL parameter
Partial Resource Representations MAY [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MAY support HTTP PUT requests for updating a subset of a resource’s properties via the oslc.properties URL parameter
Service Provider Resources MAY [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MAY provide a Service Provider Catalog resource
Service Provider Resources MUST [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MUST provide a Service Provider resource
Creation Factories MAY [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MAY provide creation factories to enable resource creation via HTTP POST
Query Capabilities SHOULD1 Reconciliation, [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers SHOULD provide query capabilities to enable clients to query for resources
Query Syntax MUST2 Reconciliation, [[!OSLCCore3]] If a service provider supports OSLC query capabilities, the query capabilities MUST support the OSLC Core Query Syntax
Query Syntax MAY [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC query capabilities MAY support other query syntaxes
Delegated UI Dialogs SHOULD [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers SHOULD allow clients to discover, via their service provider resources, any Delegated UI Dialogs they offer.
Delegated UI Dialogs SHOULD [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers SHOULD offer delegated UI dialogs for resource creation
Delegated UI Dialogs SHOULD [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers SHOULD offer delegated UI dialogs for resource selection
UI Preview SHOULD [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC Services SHOULD offer UI previews for resources that may be referenced by other resources
HTTP Basic Authentication MAY [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC Services MAY support Basic Auth
HTTP Basic Authentication SHOULD [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC Services SHOULD support Basic Auth only over HTTPS
OAuth Authentication MAY [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MAY support OAuth
OAuth Authentication SHOULD [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers that support OAuth SHOULD allow clients to discover the required OAuth URLs via their service provider resource
Error Responses MAY [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MAY provide error responses using Core-defined error formats
RDF/XML Representations MUST3 Reconciliation, [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MUST offer an RDF/XML representation for HTTP GET responses
RDF/XML Representations MUST3 Reconciliation, [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MUST accept RDF/XML representations on PUT requests.
RDF/XML Representations MUST3 Reconciliation, [[!OSLCCore3]] RDF/XML representations on POST requests whose semantic intent is to create a new resource instance.
XML Representations MAY3 Reconciliation, [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MAY provide a XML representation for HTTP GET, POST and PUT requests that conform to the Core Guidelines for XML.
JSON Representations MAY3 Reconciliation, [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers MAY provide JSON representations for HTTP GET, POST and PUT requests that conform to the Core Guidelines for JSON
HTML Representations SHOULD3 Reconciliation, [[!OSLCCore3]] OSLC service providers SHOULD provide HTML representations for HTTP GET requests

Specification Versioning

See [[!OSLCCore2]] Specification Versioning section.

Namespaces

In addition to the namespace URIs and namespace prefixes defined in the [[!OSLCCore2]], OSLC Reconciliation Workgroup defines a namespace

Resource Formats

In addition to the requirements for [[!OSLCCore3]] Defined Resource Representations , this section outlines further refinements and restrictions.

See HTTP Method support table for further clarification on support for HTTP methods and media types for each OSLC resource.

For HTTP GET requests on all OSLC Reconciliation and OSLC Core defined resource types,

For HTTP PUT/POST request formats for Reconciliation resources,

For HTTP GET response formats for Query requests,

When Reconciliation Consumers request:

Authentication

See [[!OSLCCore2]] Authentication section. This specification puts no additional constraints on authentication.

Error Responses

See [[!OSLCCore2]] Error Responses section. This specification puts no additional constraints on error responses.

Pagination

Reconciliation Providers SHOULD support pagination of query results and MAY support pagination of a single resource’s properties as defined by the [[!OSLCCore2]].

Labels for Relationships

Relationships to other resources are represented as properties whose values are the URI of the object or target resource. When a relationship property is to be presented in a user interface, it may be helpful to provide an informative and useful textual label for that relationship instance. (This in addition to the relationship property URI and the object resource URI, which are also candidates for presentation to a user.) [[!OSLCCore3]] Links Guidance allows OSLC providers to support a dcterms:title link property in resource representations, using the anchor approach (reification), but this specification discourages its use (providers SHOULD NOT use it, and consumers SHOULD NOT depend on it). At the time this specification was written, the W3C RDF working group was on a path to remove reification from the next version of RDF, and it was noted that reification never was normatively defined even in the RDF/XML syntax W3C Recommendation, where it occurs informatively.

Vocabulary Terms and Constraints

OSLC Reconciliation Version 2.0. Part 2: Vocabulary Defines the vocabulary terms and constraints for OSLC Reconciliation resources. These terms and constraints are specified according to [[!OSLCCoreVocab]].

Reconciliation Service Provider Capabilities

Service Discovery and Description

Resource Shapes

Reconciliation service providers MAY support [[!OSLCCore3]] Resource Shapes as defined in [[!OSLCCore3]] Specification Appendix A

Service Provider Resource

Reconciliation service providers MUST provide a [[!OSLCCore3]] Service Provider Resource that can be retrieved at an implementation dependent URI.

Reconciliation service providers MAY provide a [[!OSLCCore3]] Service Provider Catalog Resource that can be retrieved at an implementation dependent URI.

Reconciliation service providers MAY provide a oslc:serviceProvider property for their defined resources that will be the URI to a [[!OSLCCore3]] Service Provider Resource.

Creation Factories

If an OSLC Reconciliation service provider supports the creation of resources, there MUST be at least one [[!OSLCCore3]] Creation Factory entry in its Services definition.

See the HTTP Method support table for further clarification on support for HTTP methods and media types for each OSLC resource.

Query Capabilities

There SHOULD be at least one [[!OSLCCore3]] Query Capability entry in the Services definition.

If provided, the Query Capability MUST support the oslc:where parameter and SHOULD support the oslc:select parameter:

If shape information is NOT present with the Query Capability, service providers SHOULD use the default properties defined in [[!OSLCCore3]] RDF/XML Examples to contain the result.

Delegated UIs

Reconciliation service providers MAY support the selection of reconcilable and reconciled resources as defined by [[!OSLCCore3]] Delegated UIs in OSLC Core.

Service Provider HTTP Method Support

Support for all HTTP methods in the compliance table is not required for all resources. The following table summarizes the requirements for each HTTP method, and media type combination. A value of N/A means this specification does not impose any constraints on it.

Resource RDF/XML XML JSON HTML Compact XML Other
GET MUST MAY SHOULD SHOULD N/A N/A
PUT MAY MAY MAY N/A N/A N/A
POST MAY MAY MAY N/A N/A N/A
DELETE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Reconciliation service providers SHOULD support deletion of any resources for which they allow creation.

Appendix C: Notices

Reporting Issues on the Specification

The working group participants who author and maintain this working draft specification, monitor a distribution list where issues or questions can be raised, see Reconciliation Workgroup Mailing List

Also the issues found with this specification and their resolution can be found at OSLC Reconciliation Version 2.0 Issues.

License and Intellectual Property

We make this specification available under the terms and conditions set forth in the site Terms of Use, IP Policy and the Workgroup Participation Agreement for this workgroup.

Acknowledgements

The following individuals have participated in the creation of this specification and are gratefully acknowledged:

Participants:

Fabio Ribeiro, Koneksys (Editor)
James Amsden, IBM (Chair)
Andrew Berezovskyi, KTH (Chair)
Gray Bachelor, IBM
Tuan Dang, IBM
John Arwe, IBM
Joe Ross, IBM
Julianne Bielski, OSLC PerfMon WG Lead
Marek Smet, OSLC
Martine Wedlake, OSLC
Steve Speicher, OSLC
Ramamohan Chennamsetty, OSLC

Change History

Revision Date Editor Changes Made
01 2019-06-12 Fabio Ribeiro Draft OASIS format version created